2017-2018 NBA Advanced Team Stats

Need in-season team box score data?

Export daily updated, game-by-game NBA box score team stats and odds data to Excel.

Learn more about team evaluation metrics and calculation methods.
Mouseover team names to get a visual summary of own four factors compared to opponents’ four factors.
Click column headers to sort. Reverse the sort order by clicking on it twice.
Type any keyword in the search box to single out.

TEAM	CONF	DIVISION	GP	PTS/GMPoints Per GameAverage points per game	aPTS/GMPoints Allowed Per GameAverage points allowed per game	PTS DIFFPoints Differential{(Total Points Scored) - (Total Points Allowed)}/ (Games Played)	PACEPaceEstimate of Possessions Per 48 Minutes	OEFFOffensive EfficiencyPoints scored per 100 possessions.	DEFFDefensive EfficiencyPoints allowed per 100 possessions.	EDIFFEfficiency Differential{(Total Offensive Efficiency) - (Total Defensive Efficiency)}/ (Games Played)	CONSConsistency RatingConsistency based on game-by-game efficiency differential variation. The higher the team has a consistency rating, the more unpredictable it is.	A4FAdjusted Four FactorsCalculated by applying weights to the differentials of offensive and defensive four factors. A4F explains the specified proportion of variability in wins.	WWinsThe most important goal in sports, unless your team is not tanking	LLossesTotal count of games lost	WIN%	eWIN%Correlated Gaussian Expected Winning PercentageIndicates the ideal winning percentage based on offensive and defensive performance.	pWIN%Projected Winning PercentageEach point differential translates to 2.7 wins over the course of the season.	ACHAchievement Level In Terms of Wins. The metric is based on differential between actual and expected winning percentage. Positive figures indicate overachievement while negative figures indicate the team should have won more games.	STRKCurrent StreakWinning or losing streak for the season.
Boston	East	Atlantic	19	101.4	100.7	0.7	93.2	107.6	106.9	0.7	2.1	0.017	11	8	0.579	0.518	0.523	0.061	L 2
Cleveland	East	Central	22	101.1	102.9	-1.8	91.6	109.4	111.3	-1.9	2.7	0.005	12	10	0.545	0.459	0.441	0.086	L 4
Golden State	West	Pacific	21	110.4	100.4	10	96.5	113.9	103.6	10.3	2.8	0.105	16	5	0.762	0.737	0.829	0.025	W 6
Houston	West	Southwest	17	104.9	103.1	1.8	95.7	109.7	107.8	1.9	2.5	0.024	11	6	0.647	0.539	0.559	0.108	L 2
Indiana	East	Central	7	100.6	94.9	5.7	90.6	111	104.7	6.3	1.4	-0.025	3	4	0.429	0.651	0.688	-0.222	L 1
Miami	East	Southeast	5	103.4	114.2	-10.8	100.5	102.9	113.6	-10.7	1.2	0.021	1	4	0.200	0.233	0.144	-0.033	L 3
Milwaukee	East	Central	7	101.9	102.4	-0.5	92.4	108.6	109.2	-0.6	1.2	-0.015	3	4	0.429	0.485	0.484	-0.056	L 1
Minnesota	West	Northwest	5	101.6	110.4	-8.8	94.9	107	116.3	-9.3	1.2	-0.048	1	4	0.200	0.284	0.21	-0.084	L 2
New Orleans	West	Southwest	9	110	110.8	-0.8	102.7	107.1	107.8	-0.7	1.4	0.04	5	4	0.556	0.482	0.474	0.074	L 2
Oklahoma City	West	Northwest	6	101.2	105.5	-4.3	97.7	103.6	108	-4.4	0.8	-0.031	2	4	0.333	0.338	0.358	-0.005	L 1
Philadelphia	East	Atlantic	10	108.8	104.9	3.9	97.6	110.3	106.3	4	1.4	0.086	5	5	0.500	0.613	0.628	-0.113	L 1
Portland	West	Northwest	4	105.5	114.5	-9	98.7	106.9	116	-9.1	0.7	0.021	0	4	0.000	0.065	0.204	-0.065	L 4
San Antonio	West	Southwest	5	96.8	105.6	-8.8	93.4	103.7	113.1	-9.4	1.1	-0.015	1	4	0.200	0.253	0.21	-0.053	L 1
Toronto	East	Atlantic	10	107.3	111.7	-4.4	94.8	112.1	116.7	-4.6	1.7	0.047	4	6	0.400	0.39	0.355	0.01	L 4
Utah	West	Northwest	11	102.4	104.5	-2.1	97.7	104.8	107	-2.2	1.3	0.034	5	6	0.455	0.432	0.431	0.023	L 3
Washington	East	Southeast	6	107.2	109.2	-2	97.1	110.4	112.4	-2	0.9	-0.001	2	4	0.333	0.438	0.434	-0.105	L 2

TEAM	CONF	DIVISION	GP	PTS/GMPoints Per GameAverage points per game	aPTS/GMPoints Allowed Per GameAverage points allowed per game	PTS DIFFPoints Differential{(Total Points Scored) - (Total Points Allowed)}/ (Games Played)	PACEPaceEstimate of Possessions Per 48 Minutes	OEFFOffensive EfficiencyPoints scored per 100 possessions.	DEFFDefensive EfficiencyPoints allowed per 100 possessions.	EDIFFEfficiency Differential{(Total Offensive Efficiency) - (Total Defensive Efficiency)}/ (Games Played)	SOSStrength of the ScheduleOpponent efficiency differential average for all games played so far (venue of the games also taken into account) is used as an indicator of strength of the schedule. The higher the SoS rating, the tougher the schedule; where zero is average.	SARSchedule Adjusted RatingAn evaluation of teams based on efficiency differential and strength of schedule	CONSConsistency RatingConsistency based on game-by-game efficiency differential variation. The higher the team has a consistency rating, the more unpredictable it is.	A4FAdjusted Four FactorsCalculated by applying weights to the differentials of offensive and defensive four factors. A4F explains the specified proportion of variability in wins.	WWinsThe most important goal in sports, unless your team is not tanking	LLossesTotal count of games lost	WIN%	eWIN%Correlated Gaussian Expected Winning PercentageIndicates the ideal winning percentage based on offensive and defensive performance.	pWIN%Projected Winning PercentageEach point differential translates to 2.7 wins over the course of the season.	ACHAchievement Level In Terms of Wins. The metric is based on differential between actual and expected winning percentage. Positive figures indicate overachievement while negative figures indicate the team should have won more games.	STRKCurrent StreakWinning or losing streak for the season.
Atlanta	East	Southeast	82	103.4	108.8	-5.4	98.3	105	110.6	-5.6	0.34	-5.26	13.4	-0.037	24	58	0.293	0.338	0.322	-0.045	L 1
Boston	East	Atlantic	82	104	100.4	3.6	96	107.6	103.9	3.7	-0.88	2.82	11.5	0.033	55	27	0.671	0.627	0.619	0.044	W 1
Brooklyn	East	Atlantic	82	106.6	110.3	-3.7	98.9	106.9	110.6	-3.7	0.30	-3.40	12.2	0.021	28	54	0.341	0.381	0.378	-0.04	L 1
Charlotte	East	Southeast	82	108.2	108	0.2	98.4	109.4	109.1	0.3	0.01	0.31	12.6	-0.041	36	46	0.439	0.51	0.507	-0.071	W 1
Chicago	East	Central	82	102.9	110	-7.1	98.3	103.8	110.9	-7.1	0.56	-6.54	14.4	-0.061	27	55	0.329	0.311	0.266	0.018	L 4
Cleveland	East	Central	82	110.9	109.9	1	97.9	112.9	112	0.9	-0.01	0.89	14.4	0.009	50	32	0.610	0.525	0.533	0.085	L 1
Dallas	West	Southwest	82	102.3	105.3	-3	95.5	106.4	109.6	-3.2	0.55	-2.65	13.4	-0.054	24	58	0.293	0.406	0.401	-0.113	L 4
Denver	West	Northwest	82	110	108.5	1.5	96.9	112.4	110.9	1.5	0.26	1.76	14.3	0.015	46	36	0.561	0.542	0.549	0.019	L 1
Detroit	East	Central	82	103.8	103.9	-0.1	96.2	107.2	107.3	-0.1	-0.17	-0.27	14.6	-0.032	39	43	0.476	0.497	0.497	-0.021	W 1
Golden State	West	Pacific	82	113.5	107.5	6	99.6	113.7	107.7	6	-0.57	5.43	14.4	0.108	58	24	0.707	0.661	0.698	0.046	L 1
Houston	West	Southwest	82	112.3	103.9	8.4	97.6	114.7	106	8.7	-0.34	8.36	11.7	0.038	65	17	0.793	0.771	0.777	0.022	L 1
Indiana	East	Central	82	105.6	104.2	1.4	96	109.6	108.1	1.5	-0.52	0.98	14.2	-0.03	48	34	0.585	0.542	0.546	0.043	L 1
LA Clippers	West	Pacific	82	109	108.9	0.1	98.6	110.4	110.4	0	-0.31	-0.31	13.7	0.019	42	40	0.512	0.5	0.503	0.012	L 4
LA Lakers	West	Pacific	82	108.1	109.6	-1.5	100.3	106.5	108.1	-1.6	0.18	-1.42	13.4	0.022	35	47	0.427	0.452	0.451	-0.025	W 1
Memphis	West	Southwest	82	99.3	105.5	-6.2	94.9	104.5	111	-6.5	0.23	-6.27	11.6	-0.046	22	60	0.268	0.287	0.296	-0.019	L 2
Miami	East	Southeast	82	103.4	102.9	0.5	95.6	106.8	106.3	0.5	0.08	0.58	12.3	0.024	44	38	0.537	0.516	0.516	0.021	W 1
Milwaukee	East	Central	82	106.5	106.8	-0.3	96.2	109.8	110.1	-0.3	0.25	-0.05	12.6	-0.023	44	38	0.537	0.49	0.49	0.047	L 1
Minnesota	West	Northwest	82	109.5	107.3	2.2	96	113.4	111.1	2.3	-0.61	1.69	13	-0.052	47	35	0.573	0.57	0.572	0.003	W 3
New Orleans	West	Southwest	82	111.7	110.4	1.3	100.5	109.6	108.3	1.3	-0.56	0.74	11.9	0.041	48	34	0.585	0.544	0.543	0.041	W 5
New York	East	Atlantic	82	104.5	108	-3.5	96.8	107.1	110.7	-3.6	-0.35	-3.95	14.3	0	29	53	0.354	0.4	0.385	-0.046	W 1
Oklahoma City	West	Northwest	82	107.8	104.4	3.4	96.7	110.6	107.1	3.5	-0.72	2.78	14	-0.029	48	34	0.585	0.599	0.612	-0.014	W 3
Orlando	East	Southeast	82	103.4	108.2	-4.8	98	105.2	110.1	-4.9	0.33	-4.57	12.7	-0.024	25	57	0.305	0.349	0.342	-0.044	W 1
Philadelphia	East	Atlantic	82	109.8	105.3	4.5	99.8	109.5	105	4.5	0.66	5.16	12.7	0.097	52	30	0.634	0.638	0.648	-0.004	W 16
Phoenix	West	Pacific	82	103.9	113.3	-9.4	100.2	103.5	112.9	-9.4	0.23	-9.17	14.3	-0.035	21	61	0.256	0.256	0.19	0	W 1
Portland	West	Northwest	82	105.6	103	2.6	96.5	109.1	106.4	2.7	-0.43	2.27	13.3	0.026	49	33	0.598	0.581	0.586	0.017	W 1
Sacramento	West	Pacific	82	98.8	105.8	-7	94.9	103.7	111.1	-7.4	0.25	-7.15	12.6	-0.071	27	55	0.329	0.279	0.27	0.05	W 1
San Antonio	West	Southwest	82	102.7	99.8	2.9	95	107.9	104.8	3.1	-0.26	2.84	14.4	-0.005	47	35	0.573	0.585	0.595	-0.012	L 1
Toronto	East	Atlantic	82	111.6	103.9	7.7	97.3	113.8	105.9	7.9	-0.63	7.27	12.4	0.049	59	23	0.720	0.739	0.754	-0.019	L 1
Utah	West	Northwest	82	104.1	99.8	4.3	95.7	108.4	103.9	4.5	0.67	5.17	17.6	0.03	48	34	0.585	0.601	0.642	-0.016	L 1
Washington	East	Southeast	82	106.6	106	0.6	96.6	109.4	108.7	0.7	-0.56	0.14	14.5	0.003	43	39	0.524	0.519	0.52	0.005	L 1

Learn more about team evaluation metrics and calculation methods.
Click column headers to sort. Reverse the sort order by clicking on it twice.
Type any keyword in the search box to single out.

TEAM	CONF	DIVISION	GP	PTS/GMPoints Per GameAverage points per game	aPTS/GMPoints Allowed Per GameAverage points allowed per game	PTS DIFFPoints Differential{(Total Points Scored) - (Total Points Allowed)}/ (Games Played)	PACEPaceEstimate of Possessions Per 48 Minutes	OEFFOffensive EfficiencyPoints scored per 100 possessions.	DEFFDefensive EfficiencyPoints allowed per 100 possessions.	EDIFFEfficiency Differential{(Total Offensive Efficiency) - (Total Defensive Efficiency)}/ (Games Played)	SOSStrength of the ScheduleOpponent efficiency differential average for all games played so far (venue of the games also taken into account) is used as an indicator of strength of the schedule. The higher the SoS rating, the tougher the schedule; where zero is average.	SARSchedule Adjusted RatingAn evaluation of teams based on efficiency differential and strength of schedule	CONSConsistency RatingConsistency based on game-by-game efficiency differential variation. The higher the team has a consistency rating, the more unpredictable it is.	A4FAdjusted Four FactorsCalculated by applying weights to the differentials of offensive and defensive four factors. A4F explains the specified proportion of variability in wins.	WWinsThe most important goal in sports, unless your team is not tanking	LLossesTotal count of games lost	WIN%	eWIN%Correlated Gaussian Expected Winning PercentageIndicates the ideal winning percentage based on offensive and defensive performance.	pWIN%Projected Winning PercentageEach point differential translates to 2.7 wins over the course of the season.	ACHAchievement Level In Terms of Wins. The metric is based on differential between actual and expected winning percentage. Positive figures indicate overachievement while negative figures indicate the team should have won more games.	STRKLast 5 Games StreakWinning or losing streak for the last 5 games.
Atlanta	East	Southeast	5	102.4	108	-5.6	100	102.6	107.9	-5.4	2.13	-3.27	14.3	-0.017	2	3	0.400	0.353	0.316	0.047	L 1
Boston	East	Atlantic	5	101.2	104.4	-3.2	97.9	103.1	106.7	-3.6	-1.46	-5.06	13.3	-0.028	2	3	0.400	0.393	0.395	0.007	W 1
Brooklyn	East	Atlantic	5	109.8	108.6	1.2	101.6	108.1	106.9	1.1	-0.13	0.97	20.4	0.058	3	2	0.600	0.522	0.54	0.078	L 1
Charlotte	East	Southeast	5	117.8	111	6.8	100.5	117.7	110.2	7.5	-0.81	6.69	23.9	0.025	2	3	0.400	0.623	0.724	-0.223	W 1
Chicago	East	Central	5	102.4	116.4	-14	101	101.4	115.3	-13.9	-1.82	-15.72	15.7	-0.086	1	4	0.200	0.188	0.039	0.012	L 4
Cleveland	East	Central	5	116.2	114.4	1.8	99.9	116.2	114.3	1.9	0.74	2.64	9.6	0.006	3	2	0.600	0.579	0.559	0.021	L 1
Dallas	West	Southwest	5	103	112	-9	96.2	104.9	114.3	-9.4	0.14	-9.26	12.7	-0.059	1	4	0.200	0.229	0.204	-0.029	L 4
Denver	West	Northwest	5	107	101.8	5.2	93.8	112	106.4	5.6	1.38	6.98	9.4	0.028	4	1	0.800	0.724	0.671	0.076	L 1
Detroit	East	Central	5	111	109.2	1.8	96	113.4	111.7	1.7	-1.47	0.23	19.1	-0.005	2	3	0.400	0.535	0.559	-0.135	W 1
Golden State	West	Pacific	5	106.6	115.6	-9	99.2	107.4	116.8	-9.4	1.57	-7.83	22.4	-0.017	2	3	0.400	0.337	0.204	0.063	L 1
Houston	West	Southwest	5	101.2	100.2	1	96.5	104.7	103.9	0.9	-0.92	-0.02	11.7	0.021	3	2	0.600	0.531	0.533	0.069	L 1
Indiana	East	Central	5	103.8	108.2	-4.4	98.8	105	109.6	-4.6	4.48	-0.12	19.2	-0.015	2	3	0.400	0.405	0.355	-0.005	L 1
LA Clippers	West	Pacific	5	104.6	117.8	-13.2	98.6	106.3	119.9	-13.6	0.12	-13.48	10.2	-0.062	1	4	0.200	0.092	0.065	0.108	L 4
LA Lakers	West	Pacific	5	105.8	108.4	-2.6	99.2	104.5	107.3	-2.7	1.63	-1.07	14.5	-0.005	2	3	0.400	0.426	0.414	-0.026	W 1
Memphis	West	Southwest	5	107	116.8	-9.8	98.4	108.6	118.3	-9.7	-0.23	-9.93	16.1	-0.039	1	4	0.200	0.273	0.177	-0.073	L 2
Miami	East	Southeast	5	104.6	106	-1.4	98.3	104.3	105.8	-1.5	-0.55	-2.05	22	-0.015	3	2	0.600	0.473	0.454	0.127	W 1
Milwaukee	East	Central	5	105.8	107.8	-2	99.3	106.9	108.6	-1.6	0.42	-1.18	20.1	-0.028	3	2	0.600	0.468	0.434	0.132	L 1
Minnesota	West	Northwest	5	106.2	103.4	2.8	94.8	109.8	106.9	2.9	-0.89	2.01	18	-0.016	3	2	0.600	0.564	0.592	0.036	W 3
New Orleans	West	Southwest	5	121.2	103.2	18	103	117.7	100.3	17.5	-2.46	15.04	8.5	0.075	5	0	1.000	0.980	1.000	0.020	W 5
New York	East	Atlantic	5	103.2	106	-2.8	96.9	106.1	109.4	-3.3	-1.14	-4.44	20.5	0.026	2	3	0.400	0.436	0.408	-0.036	W 1
Oklahoma City	West	Northwest	5	115.2	106.6	8.6	100.8	114.3	105.7	8.6	1.47	10.07	9.9	-0.021	4	1	0.800	0.806	0.783	-0.006	W 3
Orlando	East	Southeast	5	98.6	108.6	-10	98	100.9	111.1	-10.1	0.26	-9.84	19.1	-0.027	2	3	0.400	0.299	0.171	0.101	W 1
Philadelphia	East	Atlantic	5	121.4	108.6	12.8	103.8	116.9	104.5	12.4	-1.59	10.81	12.4	0.043	5	0	1.000	0.842	0.921	0.158	W 5
Phoenix	West	Pacific	5	106.2	109.4	-3.2	100.1	106.6	109.1	-2.5	0.93	-1.57	19.4	0.007	2	3	0.400	0.449	0.395	-0.049	W 1
Portland	West	Northwest	5	98.4	101.6	-3.2	96.6	101.8	105.2	-3.4	5.12	1.72	7.8	-0.017	1	4	0.200	0.332	0.395	-0.132	W 1
Sacramento	West	Pacific	5	90.6	90.8	-0.2	92	98.5	98.8	-0.3	0.84	0.54	10.4	0.001	3	2	0.600	0.488	0.493	0.112	W 1
San Antonio	West	Southwest	5	106.8	109.4	-2.6	95.4	110	111.9	-1.9	-0.53	-2.43	15.7	-0.039	2	3	0.400	0.452	0.414	-0.052	L 1
Toronto	East	Atlantic	5	103.4	93.2	10.2	94.5	107.4	96.5	10.8	0.39	11.19	10.7	0.076	4	1	0.800	0.843	0.836	-0.043	L 1
Utah	West	Northwest	5	111.6	96.6	15	97.7	114.3	98.9	15.4	0.89	16.29	18.7	0.062	4	1	0.800	0.795	0.994	0.005	L 1
Washington	East	Southeast	5	104.2	108.8	-4.6	98.2	106.1	110.9	-4.8	0.68	-4.12	10.5	-0.024	1	4	0.200	0.324	0.349	-0.124	L 1

Learn more about team evaluation metrics and calculation methods.
Click column headers to sort. Reverse the sort order by clicking on it twice.
Type any keyword in the search box to single out.

TEAM	CONF	DIVISION	GP	PTS/GMPoints Per GameAverage points per game	aPTS/GMPoints Allowed Per GameAverage points allowed per game	PTS DIFFPoints Differential{(Total Points Scored) - (Total Points Allowed)}/ (Games Played)	PACEPaceEstimate of Possessions Per 48 Minutes	OEFFOffensive EfficiencyPoints scored per 100 possessions.	DEFFDefensive EfficiencyPoints allowed per 100 possessions.	EDIFFEfficiency Differential{(Total Offensive Efficiency) - (Total Defensive Efficiency)}/ (Games Played)	SOSStrength of the ScheduleOpponent efficiency differential average for all games played so far (venue of the games also taken into account) is used as an indicator of strength of the schedule. The higher the SoS rating, the tougher the schedule; where zero is average.	SARSchedule Adjusted RatingAn evaluation of teams based on efficiency differential and strength of schedule	CONSConsistency RatingConsistency based on game-by-game efficiency differential variation. The higher the team has a consistency rating, the more unpredictable it is.	A4FAdjusted Four FactorsCalculated by applying weights to the differentials of offensive and defensive four factors. A4F explains the specified proportion of variability in wins.	WWinsThe most important goal in sports, unless your team is not tanking	LLossesTotal count of games lost	WIN%	eWIN%Correlated Gaussian Expected Winning PercentageIndicates the ideal winning percentage based on offensive and defensive performance.	pWIN%Projected Winning PercentageEach point differential translates to 2.7 wins over the course of the season.	ACHAchievement Level In Terms of Wins. The metric is based on differential between actual and expected winning percentage. Positive figures indicate overachievement while negative figures indicate the team should have won more games.	STRKRoad Games StreakWinning or losing streak on the road games.
Atlanta	East	Southeast	41	102	108.8	-6.8	98.6	103.2	110.1	-6.9	2.34	-4.56	9.2	-0.04	8	33	0.195	0.226	0.276	-0.031	W 2
Boston	East	Atlantic	41	102.7	100.2	2.5	95.7	106.8	104.2	2.6	1.41	4.01	9.6	0.026	28	13	0.683	0.607	0.582	0.076	L 3
Brooklyn	East	Atlantic	41	107.3	111.7	-4.4	99.5	106.8	111.2	-4.4	2.27	-2.13	12.3	0.031	13	28	0.317	0.360	0.355	-0.043	L 1
Charlotte	East	Southeast	41	106.5	107.9	-1.4	97.9	108.5	109.9	-1.4	2.32	0.92	11.7	-0.06	15	26	0.366	0.452	0.454	-0.086	W 2
Chicago	East	Central	41	102.5	112	-9.5	98.5	102.7	112.3	-9.6	2.55	-7.05	15.7	-0.072	10	31	0.244	0.271	0.187	-0.027	L 2
Cleveland	East	Central	41	110.2	109.5	0.7	97.8	112.7	111.9	0.8	2.48	3.28	16.1	0.014	21	20	0.512	0.520	0.523	-0.008	W 1
Dallas	West	Southwest	41	100.8	106.8	-6	95.2	105.3	111.6	-6.3	3.18	-3.12	9.4	-0.073	9	32	0.220	0.251	0.302	-0.031	L 5
Denver	West	Northwest	41	108.4	111.4	-3	96.6	110.5	113.6	-3.1	2.89	-0.21	15	-0.018	15	26	0.366	0.418	0.401	-0.052	L 1
Detroit	East	Central	41	101.8	105.2	-3.4	95.9	105.6	109.2	-3.6	1.99	-1.61	14.4	-0.083	14	27	0.341	0.401	0.388	-0.060	W 1
Golden State	West	Pacific	41	113.8	109.4	4.4	100.7	112.4	108.1	4.3	2.16	6.46	13.5	0.081	29	12	0.707	0.625	0.645	0.082	L 1
Houston	West	Southwest	41	110.3	102.8	7.5	96.9	113.9	106.1	7.8	1.72	9.52	11.9	0.028	31	10	0.756	0.745	0.747	0.011	L 1
Indiana	East	Central	41	104.2	104.4	-0.2	96.4	108.1	108.4	-0.3	0.71	0.41	14.4	-0.056	21	20	0.512	0.492	0.493	0.020	W 1
LA Clippers	West	Pacific	41	108.3	109.2	-0.9	98.5	109.7	110.6	-0.9	1.43	0.53	12.4	0.007	20	21	0.488	0.471	0.47	0.017	L 2
LA Lakers	West	Pacific	41	109.3	113.3	-4	100.5	107.7	111.6	-3.9	1.96	-1.94	10.9	0.012	15	26	0.366	0.361	0.368	0.005	W 1
Memphis	West	Southwest	41	98.4	108.1	-9.7	95	103.7	113.8	-10.1	2.34	-7.76	11	-0.062	6	35	0.146	0.178	0.181	-0.032	L 5
Miami	East	Southeast	41	102.2	103.3	-1.1	96.1	105.2	106.4	-1.2	2.12	0.92	10.6	0.028	18	23	0.439	0.455	0.464	-0.016	L 1
Milwaukee	East	Central	41	106.2	107.8	-1.6	96.4	108.7	110.4	-1.7	2.20	0.50	14	-0.026	19	22	0.463	0.452	0.447	0.011	L 1
Minnesota	West	Northwest	41	107.6	108.8	-1.2	96.2	111.3	112.6	-1.3	1.67	0.37	12.7	-0.065	17	24	0.415	0.459	0.46	-0.044	W 1
New Orleans	West	Southwest	41	110.1	109	1.1	100.1	108	106.9	1.1	1.51	2.61	12.2	0.044	24	17	0.585	0.536	0.536	0.049	W 3
New York	East	Atlantic	41	102.1	110.3	-8.2	97.2	104.6	113	-8.4	1.87	-6.53	13.2	-0.045	10	31	0.244	0.262	0.23	-0.018	W 1
Oklahoma City	West	Northwest	41	106.7	105.3	1.4	96.7	109	107.6	1.4	0.50	1.90	15.9	-0.058	21	20	0.512	0.535	0.546	-0.023	W 3
Orlando	East	Southeast	41	103.1	109.1	-6	97.7	105.5	111.7	-6.2	2.11	-4.09	10.7	-0.051	8	33	0.195	0.281	0.302	-0.086	L 2
Philadelphia	East	Atlantic	41	108	107.2	0.8	99.6	108.1	107.3	0.8	2.21	3.01	11.3	0.085	22	19	0.537	0.528	0.526	0.009	W 7
Phoenix	West	Pacific	41	104.6	113.1	-8.5	99.9	104.8	113.3	-8.5	2.28	-6.22	13.8	-0.037	11	30	0.268	0.270	0.22	-0.002	W 1
Portland	West	Northwest	41	104.4	103.9	0.5	96.9	107.2	106.6	0.6	1.64	2.24	14.7	0.012	21	20	0.512	0.516	0.516	-0.004	L 5
Sacramento	West	Pacific	41	97	105.7	-8.7	94.7	102.1	111.3	-9.2	2.08	-7.12	13.6	-0.099	13	28	0.317	0.250	0.214	0.067	L 1
San Antonio	West	Southwest	41	100	101.6	-1.6	95.4	104.5	106.1	-1.6	2.22	0.62	15.2	-0.038	14	27	0.341	0.458	0.447	-0.117	L 8
Toronto	East	Atlantic	41	111.1	106	5.1	97	113.7	108.5	5.2	1.31	6.51	12.5	0.039	25	16	0.610	0.661	0.668	-0.051	L 1
Utah	West	Northwest	41	103.8	103	0.8	95.7	107.9	107	0.9	2.71	3.61	18.2	0.014	20	21	0.488	0.520	0.526	-0.032	L 1
Washington	East	Southeast	41	104.7	106.8	-2.1	96.2	107.7	109.8	-2.1	1.13	-0.97	17.1	-0.047	20	21	0.488	0.451	0.431	0.037	L 6

Learn more about team evaluation metrics and calculation methods.
Click column headers to sort. Reverse the sort order by clicking on it twice.
Type any keyword in the search box to single out.

TEAM	CONF	DIVISION	GP	PTS/GMPoints Per GameAverage points per game	aPTS/GMPoints Allowed Per GameAverage points allowed per game	PTS DIFFPoints Differential{(Total Points Scored) - (Total Points Allowed)}/ (Games Played)	PACEPaceEstimate of Possessions Per 48 Minutes	OEFFOffensive EfficiencyPoints scored per 100 possessions.	DEFFDefensive EfficiencyPoints allowed per 100 possessions.	EDIFFEfficiency Differential{(Total Offensive Efficiency) - (Total Defensive Efficiency)}/ (Games Played)	SOSStrength of the ScheduleOpponent efficiency differential average for all games played so far (venue of the games also taken into account) is used as an indicator of strength of the schedule. The higher the SoS rating, the tougher the schedule; where zero is average.	SARSchedule Adjusted RatingAn evaluation of teams based on efficiency differential and strength of schedule	CONSConsistency RatingConsistency based on game-by-game efficiency differential variation. The higher the team has a consistency rating, the more unpredictable it is.	A4FAdjusted Four FactorsCalculated by applying weights to the differentials of offensive and defensive four factors. A4F explains the specified proportion of variability in wins.	WWinsThe most important goal in sports, unless your team is not tanking	LLossesTotal count of games lost	WIN%	eWIN%Correlated Gaussian Expected Winning PercentageIndicates the ideal winning percentage based on offensive and defensive performance.	pWIN%Projected Winning PercentageEach point differential translates to 2.7 wins over the course of the season.	ACHAchievement Level In Terms of Wins. The metric is based on differential between actual and expected winning percentage. Positive figures indicate overachievement while negative figures indicate the team should have won more games.	STRKHome Games StreakWinning or losing streak at home games.
Atlanta	East	Southeast	41	104.8	108.8	-4	98	106.9	111	-4.1	-1.53	-5.63	16.4	-0.035	16	25	0.390	0.401	0.368	-0.011	L 2
Boston	East	Atlantic	41	105.3	100.7	4.6	96.4	108.4	103.6	4.8	-3.04	1.76	12.5	0.04	27	14	0.659	0.649	0.651	0.010	W 1
Brooklyn	East	Atlantic	41	105.9	109	-3.1	98.2	107	110.1	-3.1	-1.67	-4.77	12.3	0.011	15	26	0.366	0.400	0.398	-0.034	W 1
Charlotte	East	Southeast	41	109.9	108	1.9	98.9	110.3	108.3	2	-2.03	-0.03	13	-0.022	21	20	0.512	0.561	0.563	-0.049	L 3
Chicago	East	Central	41	103.3	107.9	-4.6	98.1	104.8	109.5	-4.7	-1.42	-6.12	12.4	-0.05	17	24	0.415	0.353	0.349	0.062	L 2
Cleveland	East	Central	41	111.5	110.4	1.1	98.1	113.1	112	1.1	-2.50	-1.40	12.8	0.004	29	12	0.707	0.534	0.536	0.173	L 1
Dallas	West	Southwest	41	103.8	103.9	-0.1	95.8	107.5	107.6	-0.1	-1.78	-1.88	14.5	-0.034	15	26	0.366	0.497	0.497	-0.131	L 1
Denver	West	Northwest	41	111.6	105.6	6	97.1	114.3	108.2	6.1	-2.07	4.03	11.5	0.048	31	10	0.756	0.703	0.698	0.053	W 7
Detroit	East	Central	41	105.7	102.6	3.1	96.5	108.7	105.4	3.3	-2.10	1.20	14.3	0.018	25	16	0.610	0.591	0.602	0.019	L 1
Golden State	West	Pacific	41	113.1	105.5	7.6	98.4	115	107.2	7.8	-3.29	4.51	15.2	0.135	29	12	0.707	0.696	0.75	0.011	L 1
Houston	West	Southwest	41	114.4	105	9.4	98.3	115.5	106	9.5	-2.68	6.82	11.3	0.048	34	7	0.829	0.799	0.81	0.030	L 1
Indiana	East	Central	41	106.9	103.9	3	95.6	111	107.9	3.1	-1.61	1.49	12.8	-0.005	27	14	0.659	0.596	0.599	0.063	L 1
LA Clippers	West	Pacific	41	109.7	108.7	1	98.7	111.1	110.1	1	-1.95	-0.95	14.8	0.031	22	19	0.537	0.527	0.533	0.010	L 3
LA Lakers	West	Pacific	41	106.8	106	0.8	100.1	105.4	104.5	0.9	-1.72	-0.82	15	0.032	20	21	0.488	0.524	0.526	-0.036	L 3
Memphis	West	Southwest	41	100.2	103	-2.8	94.9	105.3	108.2	-2.9	-1.76	-4.66	11.6	-0.031	16	25	0.390	0.401	0.408	-0.011	W 1
Miami	East	Southeast	41	104.6	102.6	2	95	108.5	106.3	2.2	-2.09	0.11	14.7	0.02	26	15	0.634	0.559	0.566	0.075	W 1
Milwaukee	East	Central	41	106.8	105.8	1	96.1	110.9	109.9	1	-1.48	-0.48	11.4	-0.02	25	16	0.610	0.535	0.533	0.075	W 1
Minnesota	West	Northwest	41	111.4	105.7	5.7	95.8	115.5	109.6	5.9	-3.03	2.87	12.1	-0.041	30	11	0.732	0.686	0.688	0.046	W 2
New Orleans	West	Southwest	41	113.3	111.9	1.4	100.9	111.1	109.7	1.4	-2.89	-1.49	11.6	0.037	24	17	0.585	0.548	0.546	0.037	W 2
New York	East	Atlantic	41	106.8	105.7	1.1	96.5	109.6	108.4	1.2	-3.00	-1.80	13.9	0.043	19	22	0.463	0.534	0.536	-0.071	L 2
Oklahoma City	West	Northwest	41	109	103.6	5.4	96.9	112.1	106.6	5.5	-2.02	3.48	11.9	0	27	14	0.659	0.678	0.678	-0.019	W 1
Orlando	East	Southeast	41	103.7	107.3	-3.6	98.4	104.9	108.6	-3.7	-1.68	-5.38	14.6	0.001	17	24	0.415	0.400	0.381	0.015	W 1
Philadelphia	East	Atlantic	41	111.6	103.4	8.2	100	110.8	102.7	8.1	-1.09	7.01	12.6	0.109	30	11	0.732	0.740	0.77	-0.008	W 10
Phoenix	West	Pacific	41	103.2	113.4	-10.2	100.6	102.3	112.5	-10.2	-1.81	-12.01	15	-0.032	10	31	0.244	0.248	0.164	-0.004	L 2
Portland	West	Northwest	41	106.8	102.2	4.6	96	110.9	106.1	4.8	-2.49	2.31	11.7	0.04	28	13	0.683	0.659	0.651	0.024	W 3
Sacramento	West	Pacific	41	100.7	106	-5.3	95.1	105.3	110.9	-5.6	-1.58	-7.18	11.4	-0.044	14	27	0.341	0.312	0.325	0.029	W 1
San Antonio	West	Southwest	41	105.5	98.1	7.4	94.6	111.3	103.5	7.8	-3.06	4.74	14.2	0.026	33	8	0.805	0.709	0.744	0.096	W 11
Toronto	East	Atlantic	41	112.2	101.7	10.5	97.7	114	103.4	10.6	-2.58	8.02	11.7	0.058	34	7	0.829	0.818	0.846	0.011	W 4
Utah	West	Northwest	41	104.5	96.7	7.8	95.7	108.9	100.9	8	-1.50	6.50	16.8	0.045	28	13	0.683	0.683	0.757	0.000	W 4
Washington	East	Southeast	41	108.5	105.2	3.3	97	111	107.7	3.3	-2.26	1.04	11.3	0.051	23	18	0.561	0.615	0.609	-0.054	W 1

Last updated through games completed on June 8, 2018. Regular season standings may not reflect tiebreakers accurately.