|
The Impact Of Rest Days On Team Efficiency & Pace |
|
Check out more detailed rest days stats in the NBA
2009-2010 NBA Regular Season Rest Days Stats (Also includes a chart)
2009-2010 NBA Regular Season Rest Days Stats.
The information provided below belongs to 2007-2008 NBA regular season.
| OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
|
DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
| TOP 5 |
∆* |
|
TOP 5 |
∆* |
| New Orleans |
9.4 |
|
Toronto |
-12.4 |
| San Antonio |
8.0 |
|
Seattle |
-9.0 |
| New Jersey |
5.1 |
|
Portland |
-4.9 |
| Charlotte |
4.2 |
|
Washington |
-3.6 |
| Minnesota |
3.6 |
|
Dallas |
-3.2 |
| BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
|
BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
| Seattle |
-10.3 |
|
New Orleans |
12.9 |
| New York |
-5.6 |
|
Boston |
7.3 |
| Chicago |
-2.9 |
|
Charlotte |
7.1 |
| Dallas |
-2.7 |
|
Denver |
7.1 |
| Memphis |
-2.5 |
|
Utah |
6.6 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation
| OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
|
DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
| TOP 5 |
∆* |
|
TOP 5 |
∆* |
| Dallas |
3.9 |
|
New Jersey |
-12.4 |
| Golden State |
3.1 |
|
Milwaukee |
-9.0 |
| Utah |
3.0 |
|
Boston |
-4.9 |
| Memphis |
2.6 |
|
Indiana |
-3.6 |
| Phoenix |
1.8 |
|
Denver |
-3.2 |
| BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
|
BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
| Boston |
-3.7 |
|
Sacramento |
12.9 |
| Chicago |
-3.4 |
|
Atlanta |
7.3 |
| Minnesota |
-3.0 |
|
New York |
7.1 |
| Detroit |
-2.6 |
|
LA Lakers |
7.1 |
| New Jersey |
-2.3 |
|
Dallas |
6.6 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation
| OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
|
DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
| TOP 5 |
∆* |
|
TOP 5 |
∆* |
| LA Clippers |
15.7 |
|
LA Clippers |
-10.6 |
| Portland |
9.7 |
|
Boston |
-8.4 |
| Chicago |
8.8 |
|
New York |
-7.3 |
| Indiana |
8.4 |
|
Detroit |
-7.3 |
| San Antonio |
7.3 |
|
Philadelphia |
-6.5 |
| BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
|
BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
| Seattle |
-19.1 |
|
Milwaukee |
20.3 |
| Detroit |
-13.1 |
|
Cleveland |
18.1 |
| New York |
-10.1 |
|
San Antonio |
17.0 |
| Golden State |
-8.4 |
|
Dallas |
16.3 |
| Phoenix |
-7.3 |
|
Houston |
14.5 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation
| OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
|
DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
| TOP 5 |
∆* |
|
TOP 5 |
∆* |
| Detroit |
4.3 |
|
Dallas |
-3.4 |
| New York |
3.7 |
|
Boston |
-3.3 |
| Boston |
2.7 |
|
New York |
-3.1 |
| Seattle |
2.7 |
|
Detroit |
-2.9 |
| Minnesota |
2.3 |
|
Philadelphia |
-2.1 |
| BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
|
BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
| Philadelphia |
-2.0 |
|
Philadelphia |
1.9 |
| Toronto |
-1.9 |
|
Cleveland |
1.5 |
| Milwaukee |
-1.8 |
|
San Antonio |
1.0 |
| Cleveland |
-1.6 |
|
Dallas |
1.0 |
| Phoenix |
-1.2 |
|
Houston |
0.9 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation
| OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
|
DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
| TOP 5 |
∆* |
|
TOP 5 |
∆* |
| Toronto |
6.5 |
|
Sacramento |
-5.8 |
| Cleveland |
6.3 |
|
Orlando |
-5.3 |
| Houston |
5.9 |
|
New York |
-4.6 |
| Charlotte |
5.8 |
|
Detroit |
-3.6 |
| New Orleans |
5.2 |
|
Washington |
-3.5 |
| BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
|
BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
| San Antonio |
-7.3 |
|
Philadelphia |
7.2 |
| New York |
-6.4 |
|
Dallas |
5.4 |
| Seattle |
-3.4 |
|
Cleveland |
4.6 |
| Utah |
-3.3 |
|
Utah |
4.1 |
| Dallas |
-2.9 |
|
Minnesota |
3.8 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation
| OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
|
DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY |
|
| TOP 5 |
∆* |
|
TOP 5 |
∆* |
| New York |
4.1 |
|
Utah |
-9.8 |
| Cleveland |
2.7 |
|
Minnesota |
-8.3 |
| Philadelphia |
2.3 |
|
Sacramento |
-6.6 |
| Toronto |
2.1 |
|
LA Clippers |
-6.0 |
| Phoenix |
1.1 |
|
Philadelphia |
-5.3 |
| BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
|
BOTTOM 5 |
∆* |
| Detroit |
-6.8 |
|
Detroit |
6.1 |
| Charlotte |
-6.6 |
|
Boston |
5.9 |
| Sacramento |
-6.2 |
|
Miami |
4.2 |
| Golden State |
-4.1 |
|
Indiana |
2.5 |
| Indiana |
-3.9 |
|
New York |
2.4 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation
-
B2B: teams playing second leg of back to back game sets
-
3rdIN4: teams playing third game in four nights
-
4thIN5: teams playing fourth game in 5 nights
-
1: teams coming up the game w/ one day rest
-
2: teams coming up the game w/ two days rest
-
3+: teams coming up the game w/ at least three days rest
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 25 February 2010 )
|
