|
The Impact Of Rest Days On Team Efficiency & Pace |
|
| OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | New Orleans | 9.4 | | Toronto | -12.4 | | San Antonio | 8.0 | | Seattle | -9.0 | | New Jersey | 5.1 | | Portland | -4.9 | | Charlotte | 4.2 | | Washington | -3.6 | | Minnesota | 3.6 | | Dallas | -3.2 | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | Seattle | -10.3 | | New Orleans | 12.9 | | New York | -5.6 | | Boston | 7.3 | | Chicago | -2.9 | | Charlotte | 7.1 | | Dallas | -2.7 | | Denver | 7.1 | | Memphis | -2.5 | | Utah | 6.6 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation | OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | Dallas | 3.9 | | New Jersey | -12.4 | | Golden State | 3.1 | | Milwaukee | -9.0 | | Utah | 3.0 | | Boston | -4.9 | | Memphis | 2.6 | | Indiana | -3.6 | | Phoenix | 1.8 | | Denver | -3.2 | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | Boston | -3.7 | | Sacramento | 12.9 | | Chicago | -3.4 | | Atlanta | 7.3 | | Minnesota | -3.0 | | New York | 7.1 | | Detroit | -2.6 | | LA Lakers | 7.1 | | New Jersey | -2.3 | | Dallas | 6.6 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation | OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | LA Clippers | 15.7 | | LA Clippers | -10.6 | | Portland | 9.7 | | Boston | -8.4 | | Chicago | 8.8 | | New York | -7.3 | | Indiana | 8.4 | | Detroit | -7.3 | | San Antonio | 7.3 | | Philadelphia | -6.5 | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | Seattle | -19.1 | | Milwaukee | 20.3 | | Detroit | -13.1 | | Cleveland | 18.1 | | New York | -10.1 | | San Antonio | 17.0 | | Golden State | -8.4 | | Dallas | 16.3 | | Phoenix | -7.3 | | Houston | 14.5 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation | OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | Detroit | 4.3 | | Dallas | -3.4 | | New York | 3.7 | | Boston | -3.3 | | Boston | 2.7 | | New York | -3.1 | | Seattle | 2.7 | | Detroit | -2.9 | | Minnesota | 2.3 | | Philadelphia | -2.1 | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | Philadelphia | -2.0 | | Philadelphia | 1.9 | | Toronto | -1.9 | | Cleveland | 1.5 | | Milwaukee | -1.8 | | San Antonio | 1.0 | | Cleveland | -1.6 | | Dallas | 1.0 | | Phoenix | -1.2 | | Houston | 0.9 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation | OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | Toronto | 6.5 | | Sacramento | -5.8 | | Cleveland | 6.3 | | Orlando | -5.3 | | Houston | 5.9 | | New York | -4.6 | | Charlotte | 5.8 | | Detroit | -3.6 | | New Orleans | 5.2 | | Washington | -3.5 | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | San Antonio | -7.3 | | Philadelphia | 7.2 | | New York | -6.4 | | Dallas | 5.4 | | Seattle | -3.4 | | Cleveland | 4.6 | | Utah | -3.3 | | Utah | 4.1 | | Dallas | -2.9 | | Minnesota | 3.8 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation | OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY | | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | TOP 5 | ∆* | | New York | 4.1 | | Utah | -9.8 | | Cleveland | 2.7 | | Minnesota | -8.3 | | Philadelphia | 2.3 | | Sacramento | -6.6 | | Toronto | 2.1 | | LA Clippers | -6.0 | | Phoenix | 1.1 | | Philadelphia | -5.3 | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | BOTTOM 5 | ∆* | | Detroit | -6.8 | | Detroit | 6.1 | | Charlotte | -6.6 | | Boston | 5.9 | | Sacramento | -6.2 | | Miami | 4.2 | | Golden State | -4.1 | | Indiana | 2.5 | | Indiana | -3.9 | | New York | 2.4 |
*: Efficiency change under the given rest day situation B2B: teams playing second leg of back to back game sets 3rdIN4: teams playing third game in four nights 4thIN5: teams playing fourth game in 5 nights 1: teams coming up the game w/ one day rest 2: teams coming up the game w/ two days rest 3+: teams coming up the game w/ at least three days rest
|
|
Last Updated ( Sunday, 15 June 2008 )
|
TEAM STATS 
